ToolsPouch

Free · No sign-up · Runs in your browser

PC Parts Comparison Tool

Compare any two processors, graphics cards, motherboards, RAM kits, SSDs, hard drives or power supplies side by side, from Intel Core i3 to Core i9 and Core Ultra, every AMD Ryzen generation, and NVIDIA, AMD Radeon and Intel Arc graphics. See every spec first, then the measured benchmark difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

APart A

AMD

Ryzen 5 7600

Measured performance

Blender render score
210 samples/min
Benchmark submissions
14

Cores & clocks

Cores
6
Efficiency (E) cores
—
Threads
12
Base clock
3.8 GHz
Max boost clock
5.1 GHz

Memory & cache

L3 cache
32 MB
Memory support
DDR5

Power

TDP / base power
65 W

Features

Integrated graphics
Yes

Platform

Architecture
Zen 4
Socket
AM5
Manufacturing process
5 nm
Release year
2023
Launch price
$229
VS

BPart B

Intel

Core i5-14400F

Measured performance

Blender render score
213 samples/min
Benchmark submissions
14

Cores & clocks

Cores
10
Efficiency (E) cores
4
Threads
16
Base clock
2.5 GHz
Max boost clock
4.7 GHz

Memory & cache

L3 cache
20 MB
Memory support
DDR4 / DDR5

Power

TDP / base power
65 W

Features

Integrated graphics
No

Platform

Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
Socket
LGA1700
Manufacturing process
Intel 7
Release year
2024
Launch price
$196
Compare these parts

PC parts benchmark

Interactive PC Parts Comparison Chart & Benchmark Matrix

This PC parts comparison chart lines up current hardware tiers using a number that was actually measured, not a marketing claim. It covers 667 processors and 319 graphics cards in the full tool, and the rows below are the tiers most buyers shop in. Every row links to a head-to-head page, so the chart doubles as a quick PC performance comparison you can click into.

How the benchmark column works. We do not estimate performance from theoretical specifications such as clock frequency multiplied by core count, because two chips at the same speed can differ by a factor of two once architecture, cache and memory are involved. The PC parts benchmark shown here is the median Blender Benchmark render score from Blender Open Data, a public collection of results submitted by real users (5.2.0), in samples per minute. We show clocks, cores and power separately as specifications, so you can see both what a part is rated for and what it measured.

Read it with two caveats. Blender measures rendering, not game frame rates, and it tends to favour cards with strong ray-tracing and compute hardware, which is why some AMD cards score lower here than their gaming performance suggests. The resolution and role columns are our editorial guidance for each tier and are not benchmark results.

Graphics card tiers

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Graphics card tiers with measured Blender render score, suggested gaming resolution and efficiency
TierGPUBlender render scoreSuggested gaming targetEfficiency (score per W)Compare
FlagshipNVIDIA GeForce RTX 509016,072215 results1080p1440p4KExcellent28.0 per W (575 W)Compare tier ›
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 409011,551109 results1080p1440p4KExcellent25.7 per W (450 W)
High-endNVIDIA GeForce RTX 50809,148387 results1080p1440p4KExcellent25.4 per W (360 W)Compare tier ›
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX4,97476 results1080p1440p4KExcellent14.0 per W (355 W)
Upper mid-rangeNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER5,951125 results1080p1440p4KExcellent27.1 per W (220 W)Compare tier ›
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT3,367421 results1080p1440p4KGood11.1 per W (304 W)
Mid-rangeNVIDIA GeForce RTX 40602,96872 results1080p1440p4KExcellent25.8 per W (115 W)Compare tier ›
AMD Radeon RX 76001,21619 results1080p1440p4KFair7.4 per W (165 W)
EntryNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB1,13328 results1080p1440p4KFair8.7 per W (130 W)Compare tier ›
AMD Radeon RX 660075419 results1080p1440p4KLow5.7 per W (132 W)

Processor tiers

Swipe the table sideways to see every column.

Processor tiers with measured Blender render score, typical role and efficiency
TierCPUBlender render scoreTypical roleEfficiency (score per W)Compare
FlagshipAMD Ryzen 9 9950X666127 resultsHeavy multi-threaded work: rendering, encoding and compilingExcellent3.9 per W (170 W)Compare tier ›
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K575118 resultsExcellent4.6 per W (125 W)
Gaming-focusedAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D368209 resultsHigh-frame-rate 1080p and esports, helped by a large cacheGood3.1 per W (120 W)Compare tier ›
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D293108 resultsGood2.4 per W (120 W)
Mid-rangeAMD Ryzen 5 760021014 results1080p to 1440p gaming and everyday multitaskingGood3.2 per W (65 W)Compare tier ›
Intel Core i5-14400F21314 resultsGood3.3 per W (65 W)
BudgetAMD Ryzen 5 560015459 resultsEntry builds paired with a mid-range graphics cardGood2.4 per W (65 W)Compare tier ›
Intel Core i5-12400F16816 resultsGood2.6 per W (65 W)

Efficiency is the Blender score divided by the part’s rated TDP or board power, rated against every part in the same category (Excellent is the top quarter). Rated power is a specification, not a measured draw. Scores are medians, so a part with few results is less certain than one with hundreds; the count is shown under each score.

PC parts comparison site

Why ToolsPouch is a Fast and Private PC Parts Comparison Site

Plenty of PC parts comparison website options hide how their numbers are made. We try to do the opposite: show where each figure comes from, show how many results it rests on, and keep the tool quick enough that comparing parts feels like flipping through a catalogue.

Open community benchmark data

Benchmark scores come from Blender Open Data, a public, license-free set of results submitted by real users, rather than from a closed formula we control. We show the median and the number of submissions behind it. Our 0 to 100 scores are our own weighted blend of that measurement and published specs, and the method is explained in the FAQ.

Instant hardware lookups

Search runs in your browser against a local index of 1029 parts, including 667 CPUs and 319 GPUs, with prefix matching and typo tolerance. Type “5600” or “4060” and matches appear as you type, with no round trip to a server.

Private, with no sign-up

Full comparison matrices are available instantly with no account, and we do not store the parts you choose. Each comparison is a plain web page built from public data, so you can bookmark it or share the link.

PC build comparison

Gaming PC Parts Comparison: Avoiding Bottlenecks in Your Next PC Build

A good gaming PC parts comparison is not about finding the single fastest part. It is about a balanced PC build comparison, where no component wastes the money you spent on another. These three checks catch most mistakes.

CPU vs GPU balance

Frame rate is limited by whichever of the two is slower for that moment in the game. In fast esports titles at 1080p with a high refresh rate, the processor usually sets the ceiling, so a slow CPU will hold back even a strong graphics card. At 4K and with ray tracing the graphics card does most of the work and an average modern processor is enough. Pair a flagship GPU with a mid-range or better CPU, and avoid putting a budget quad-core behind an expensive card. Use the processor tiers above to check that your two parts sit within a tier of each other.

Memory and VRAM: 8 GB vs 16 GB

Video memory holds textures and game assets. Many recent AAA games at high or ultra textures can exceed 8 GB at 1440p and above, which shows up as stutter, long loads or textures that pop in. 12 GB is a comfortable level for 1440p, and 16 GB gives headroom for 4K, ray tracing and texture mods. Some graphics cards are sold in both 8 GB and 16 GB versions of the same chip, so compare them separately. For system RAM, 16 GB is the practical minimum and 32 GB is a better fit if you also stream, edit video or keep many apps open.

Thermals and TDP: sizing your power supply

TDP and board power are rated figures, but they are the best way to compare how much heat and electrical load two parts bring. Add the rated power of the CPU and GPU, then leave generous headroom for the rest of the system and short power spikes. For example, a Ryzen 7 7800X3D (120 W) with a GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (220 W) adds up to 340 W before headroom, which is why a quality 650 to 750 W unit is a common choice.Lower-power parts also run cooler and quieter, which is why the chart shows efficiency next to the score.

PC performance comparison

How to Accurately Compare PC Parts Performance

This PC parts comparison tool takes about ten seconds to use. These three steps get the most out of it when you want to compare parts that are close in price or tier.

  1. Select Component A and Component B

    Pick a category tab, then search for each part in its own field. Use two parts of the same type: two CPUs, two GPUs and so on. A good test is the part you own against the one you are thinking of buying, or two rivals at the same price.

  2. Analyze the percentage performance delta

    Press Compare. The Measured performance block shows both benchmark medians and the exact gap between them, as a percentage or a multiple when one part is several times faster. Check the submission counts underneath: a gap based on hundreds of results is firmer than one based on a handful.

  3. Review the architectural spec differences

    Scroll to the specification table, where the better value in each row is marked with its percentage advantage. Look at architecture, cores and threads, cache, video memory, memory bus and rated power, then read the verdict and the gaming, office, daily and creation scores before you check current prices.

Questions

Frequently Asked Questions About PC Hardware Comparison

What is the best way to do a gaming pc parts comparison?

Compare parts of the same type and the same price tier, and work in a sensible order. Start with the graphics card, because it sets frame rate at 1440p and 4K: look at its measured render score, its video memory and its rated power. Then check that your processor will not hold it back at the resolution and refresh rate you play at, by comparing cores, boost clock and cache. After that confirm 16 GB or more of RAM and size the power supply from the rated power of the CPU and GPU. Open each matchup on ToolsPouch for the measured difference, then look at independent game benchmarks, because Blender measures rendering rather than frame rates, and check the current price before you buy.

How are the performance scores calculated on this pc parts comparison website?

There are two layers. The measured layer is the median Blender Benchmark render score from Blender Open Data (5.2.0 for the current data), shown with the number of submissions behind each median, and the percentage difference between two parts is simply the gap between those two medians. We do not run benchmarks ourselves. The second layer is our own 0 to 100 score for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation: a weighted blend of the measured score and published specifications such as clock speed, cache, video memory and rated power. If a value is missing for a part it is skipped, never guessed, and two scores within 3 points are called a tie.

Can I compare a CPU directly against a GPU?

No, and the tool will not let you. A CPU has a small number of complex cores built to run varied, sequential work quickly, while a GPU has thousands of simpler units built to run the same operation on huge amounts of data in parallel. Their cores, clock speeds, memory and power figures measure different things, and a CPU render score and a GPU render score come from different workloads, so ranking one against the other would be meaningless. You can compare two CPUs or two GPUs, and you can use both charts together in a PC build comparison to check the pairing makes sense.

How does a PC build comparison help prevent hardware bottlenecks?

A bottleneck is the slowest part limiting everything else. By comparing the tier of your processor and graphics card side by side, and comparing your current part with the one you plan to buy, you can see whether an upgrade will actually raise performance. If a new graphics card is several times faster than your old one but your processor sits two tiers below it, the processor will cap frame rates at high refresh rates and part of the new card will go unused. The same logic applies to memory capacity, video memory and the power supply.

How frequently is the hardware benchmark database updated?

The underlying Blender Open Data set is refreshed daily by the Blender Foundation. Our copy is refreshed whenever we re-run our data sync, which is done periodically rather than automatically, so the date shown is the one to trust: the database was last updated on 2026-11-04. When a new Blender release changes the scoring, we state the version used. Specifications and launch prices are maintained separately and corrected when readers report mistakes to support@toolspouch.com.