ToolsPouch

CPU comparison

Intel Core i5-13400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Benchmark comparison and full specifications, with the measured difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

APart A

Intel

Core i5-13400F

  • Blender render score 198 samples/min
  • Cores 10
  • Max boost clock 4.6 GHz
VS

BPart B

AMD

Ryzen 5 8600G

  • Blender render score 187 samples/min
  • Cores 6
  • Max boost clock 5.0 GHz
Compare other parts

01 · Performance profile

How they score

Scores out of 100 for each way you might use a processor. The chart shows where both parts rank among all 667 CPUs in our database.

Measured performance

Intel Core i5-13400F is 6% faster in the Blender benchmark

AIntel Core i5-13400F198

Median of 9 submissions

BAMD Ryzen 5 8600G187

Median of 5 submissions

Blender Benchmark render score (samples per minute, higher is faster), the median of community-submitted results from Blender Open Data.

A
B
Lowest: 2Average: 22Highest: 79

Gaming

A39%Fair
B42%Fair

Too close to call

Office Work

A44%Fair
B67%Good

Better pick: Ryzen 5 8600G · Integrated graphics: Yes vs No

Daily Use

A42%Fair
B59%Good

Better pick: Ryzen 5 8600G · Integrated graphics: Yes vs No

Content Creation

A40%Fair
B35%Fair

Better pick: Core i5-13400F · Threads: 16 vs 12

02 · Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G comes out ahead

It wins 3 of 8 compared specifications and scores higher overall. Check current prices before you buy.

AIntel Core i5-13400F

41/100

BAMD Ryzen 5 8600G

51/100

AIntel Core i5-13400F

Advantages

  • Cores 10 vs 6 (67% higher)
  • Threads 16 vs 12 (33% higher)
  • L3 cache 20 MB vs 16 MB (25% higher)
  • Blender render score 198 samples/min vs 187 samples/min (6% higher)

Disadvantages

  • Integrated graphics No vs Yes
  • Base clock 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz (42% lower)
  • Max boost clock 4.6 GHz vs 5.0 GHz (8% lower)

BAMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Advantages

  • Integrated graphics Yes vs No
  • Base clock 4.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz (72% higher)
  • Max boost clock 5.0 GHz vs 4.6 GHz (9% higher)

Disadvantages

  • Cores 6 vs 10 (40% lower)
  • Threads 12 vs 16 (25% lower)
  • L3 cache 16 MB vs 20 MB (20% lower)
  • Blender render score 187 samples/min vs 198 samples/min (6% lower)

03 · Full comparison

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationAIntel Core i5-13400FBAMD Ryzen 5 8600G
Measured performance
Blender render scoreMedian of community-submitted Blender Benchmark results (Blender Open Data). Higher is faster.198 samples/min Better +6%187 samples/min
Benchmark submissionsHow many results the median is based on. Small numbers are less reliable.95
Cores & clocks
Cores10 Better +67%6
Efficiency (E) cores4—
Threads16 Better +33%12
Base clock2.5 GHz4.3 GHz Better +72%
Max boost clock4.6 GHz5.0 GHz Better +9%
Memory & cache
L3 cache20 MB Better +25%16 MB
Memory supportDDR4 / DDR5DDR5
Power
TDP / base power65 W65 W
Features
Integrated graphicsNoYes Better
Platform
ArchitectureRaptor LakeZen 4
SocketLGA1700AM5
Manufacturing processIntel 74 nm
Release year20232024
Launch price$196$229

Ready to buy?

Prices change daily. Check the current price of each part.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.