ToolsPouch

CPU comparison

Intel Core i9-14900KS vs AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Benchmark comparison and full specifications, with the measured difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

APart A

Intel

Core i9-14900KS

  • Blender render score 541 samples/min
  • Cores 24
  • Max boost clock 6.2 GHz
VS

BPart B

AMD

Ryzen 9 9900X

  • Blender render score 508 samples/min
  • Cores 12
  • Max boost clock 5.6 GHz
Compare other parts

01 · Performance profile

How they score

Scores out of 100 for each way you might use a processor. The chart shows where both parts rank among all 667 CPUs in our database.

Measured performance

Intel Core i9-14900KS is 6% faster in the Blender benchmark

AIntel Core i9-14900KS541

Median of 3 submissions

BAMD Ryzen 9 9900X508

Median of 62 submissions

Blender Benchmark render score (samples per minute, higher is faster), the median of community-submitted results from Blender Open Data.

A
B
Lowest: 2Average: 22Highest: 79

Gaming

A79%Excellent
B77%Excellent

Too close to call

Office Work

A79%Excellent
B74%Good

Better pick: Core i9-14900KS · Max boost clock: 6.2 GHz vs 5.6 GHz

Daily Use

A72%Good
B69%Good

Too close to call

Content Creation

A72%Good
B61%Good

Better pick: Core i9-14900KS · Threads: 32 vs 24

02 · Verdict

Intel Core i9-14900KS comes out ahead

It wins 4 of 8 compared specifications and scores higher overall. Check current prices before you buy.

AIntel Core i9-14900KS

76/100

BAMD Ryzen 9 9900X

70/100

AIntel Core i9-14900KS

Advantages

  • Cores 24 vs 12 (100% higher)
  • Threads 32 vs 24 (33% higher)
  • Max boost clock 6.2 GHz vs 5.6 GHz (11% higher)
  • Blender render score 541 samples/min vs 508 samples/min (6% higher)

Disadvantages

  • L3 cache 36 MB vs 64 MB (44% lower)
  • Base clock 3.2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz (27% lower)
  • TDP / base power 150 W vs 120 W (25% higher)

BAMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Advantages

  • L3 cache 64 MB vs 36 MB (78% higher)
  • Base clock 4.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz (38% higher)
  • TDP / base power 120 W vs 150 W (20% lower)

Disadvantages

  • Cores 12 vs 24 (50% lower)
  • Threads 24 vs 32 (25% lower)
  • Max boost clock 5.6 GHz vs 6.2 GHz (10% lower)
  • Blender render score 508 samples/min vs 541 samples/min (6% lower)

03 · Full comparison

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationAIntel Core i9-14900KSBAMD Ryzen 9 9900X
Measured performance
Blender render scoreMedian of community-submitted Blender Benchmark results (Blender Open Data). Higher is faster.541 samples/min Better +6%508 samples/min
Benchmark submissionsHow many results the median is based on. Small numbers are less reliable.362
Cores & clocks
Cores24 Better +100%12
Efficiency (E) cores16—
Threads32 Better +33%24
Base clock3.2 GHz4.4 GHz Better +38%
Max boost clock6.2 GHz Better +11%5.6 GHz
Memory & cache
L3 cache36 MB64 MB Better +78%
Memory supportDDR4 / DDR5DDR5
Power
TDP / base power150 W120 W Better
Features
Integrated graphicsYesYes
Platform
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshZen 5
SocketLGA1700AM5
Manufacturing processIntel 74 nm
Release year20242024
Launch price$689$499

Ready to buy?

Prices change daily. Check the current price of each part.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.