ToolsPouch

CPU comparison

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Benchmark comparison and full specifications, with the measured difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

APart A

Intel

Core Ultra 5 245K

  • Blender render score 272 samples/min
  • Cores 14
  • Max boost clock 5.2 GHz
VS

BPart B

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900X

  • Blender render score 275 samples/min
  • Cores 12
  • Max boost clock 4.6 GHz
Compare other parts

01 · Performance profile

How they score

Scores out of 100 for each way you might use a processor. The chart shows where both parts rank among all 667 CPUs in our database.

Measured performance

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is 1% faster in the Blender benchmark

AIntel Core Ultra 5 245K272

Median of 28 submissions

BAMD Ryzen 9 3900X275

Median of 12 submissions

Blender Benchmark render score (samples per minute, higher is faster), the median of community-submitted results from Blender Open Data.

A
B
Lowest: 2Average: 22Highest: 79

Gaming

A57%Good
B57%Good

Too close to call

Office Work

A70%Good
B40%Fair

Better pick: Core Ultra 5 245K · Integrated graphics: Yes vs No

Daily Use

A62%Good
B41%Fair

Better pick: Core Ultra 5 245K · Integrated graphics: Yes vs No

Content Creation

A44%Fair
B50%Fair

Better pick: Ryzen 9 3900X · Threads: 24 vs 14

02 · Verdict

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K comes out ahead

It wins 4 of 8 compared specifications and scores higher overall. Check current prices before you buy.

AIntel Core Ultra 5 245K

58/100

BAMD Ryzen 9 3900X

47/100

AIntel Core Ultra 5 245K

Advantages

  • Integrated graphics Yes vs No
  • Cores 14 vs 12 (17% higher)
  • Max boost clock 5.2 GHz vs 4.6 GHz (13% higher)
  • Base clock 4.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz (11% higher)

Disadvantages

  • L3 cache 24 MB vs 64 MB (63% lower)
  • Threads 14 vs 24 (42% lower)
  • TDP / base power 125 W vs 105 W (19% higher)
  • Blender render score 272 samples/min vs 275 samples/min (1% lower)

BAMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Advantages

  • L3 cache 64 MB vs 24 MB (167% higher)
  • Threads 24 vs 14 (71% higher)
  • TDP / base power 105 W vs 125 W (16% lower)
  • Blender render score 275 samples/min vs 272 samples/min (1% higher)

Disadvantages

  • Integrated graphics No vs Yes
  • Cores 12 vs 14 (14% lower)
  • Max boost clock 4.6 GHz vs 5.2 GHz (12% lower)
  • Base clock 3.8 GHz vs 4.2 GHz (10% lower)

03 · Full comparison

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationAIntel Core Ultra 5 245KBAMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Measured performance
Blender render scoreMedian of community-submitted Blender Benchmark results (Blender Open Data). Higher is faster.272 samples/min275 samples/min Better +1%
Benchmark submissionsHow many results the median is based on. Small numbers are less reliable.2812
Cores & clocks
Cores14 Better +17%12
Efficiency (E) cores8—
Threads1424 Better +71%
Base clock4.2 GHz Better +11%3.8 GHz
Max boost clock5.2 GHz Better +13%4.6 GHz
Memory & cache
L3 cache24 MB64 MB Better +167%
Memory supportDDR5DDR4
Power
TDP / base power125 W105 W Better
Features
Integrated graphicsYes BetterNo
Platform
ArchitectureArrow LakeZen 2
SocketLGA1851AM4
Manufacturing processTSMC N3B7 nm
Release year20242019
Launch price$309$499

Ready to buy?

Prices change daily. Check the current price of each part.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.