ToolsPouch

GPU comparison

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

Benchmark comparison and full specifications, with the measured difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

APart A

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

  • Blender render score 686 samples/min
  • Video memory 6 GB
  • Board power 120 W
VS

BPart B

AMD

Radeon RX 6600

  • Blender render score 754 samples/min
  • Video memory 8 GB
  • Board power 132 W
Compare other parts

01 · Performance profile

How they score

Scores out of 100 for each way you might use a graphics card. The chart shows where both parts rank among all 319 GPUs in our database.

Measured performance

AMD Radeon RX 6600 is 10% faster in the Blender benchmark

ANVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti686

Median of 31 submissions

BAMD Radeon RX 6600754

Median of 19 submissions

Blender Benchmark render score (samples per minute, higher is faster), the median of community-submitted results from Blender Open Data.

A
B
Lowest: 4Average: 32Highest: 93

Gaming

A19%Basic
B21%Basic

Too close to call

Office Work

A55%Good
B55%Good

Too close to call

Daily Use

A34%Basic
B36%Fair

Too close to call

Content Creation

A19%Basic
B22%Basic

Too close to call

02 · Verdict

Too close to call

Both parts score within a few points. Choose on price, availability and the use case that matters most to you.

ANVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

32/100

BAMD Radeon RX 6600

34/100

ANVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Advantages

  • Memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit (50% higher)
  • Board power 120 W vs 132 W (9% lower)

Disadvantages

  • Boost clock 1770 MHz vs 2491 MHz (29% lower)
  • Video memory 6 GB vs 8 GB (25% lower)
  • Shader units 1536 vs 1792 (14% lower)
  • Blender render score 686 samples/min vs 754 samples/min (9% lower)

BAMD Radeon RX 6600

Advantages

  • Boost clock 2491 MHz vs 1770 MHz (41% higher)
  • Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB (33% higher)
  • Shader units 1792 vs 1536 (17% higher)
  • Blender render score 754 samples/min vs 686 samples/min (10% higher)

Disadvantages

  • Memory bus 128 bit vs 192 bit (33% lower)
  • Board power 132 W vs 120 W (10% higher)

03 · Full comparison

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationANVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 TiBAMD Radeon RX 6600
Measured performance
Blender render scoreMedian of community-submitted Blender Benchmark results (Blender Open Data). Higher is faster.686 samples/min754 samples/min Better +10%
Benchmark submissionsHow many results the median is based on. Small numbers are less reliable.3119
Memory
Video memory6 GB8 GB Better +33%
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bit Better +50%128 bit
Cores & clocks
Shader units15361792 Better +17%
Boost clock1770 MHz2491 MHz Better +41%
Power
Board power120 W Better132 W
Platform
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
Release year20192021
Launch price$279$329

Ready to buy?

Prices change daily. Check the current price of each part.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.