ToolsPouch

CPU comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Benchmark comparison and full specifications, with the measured difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

APart A

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700X

  • Blender render score 136 samples/min
  • Cores 8
  • Max boost clock 3.8 GHz
VS

BPart B

AMD

Ryzen 7 2700

  • Blender render score 138 samples/min
  • Cores 8
  • Max boost clock 4.1 GHz
Compare other parts

01 · Performance profile

How they score

Scores out of 100 for each way you might use a processor. The chart shows where both parts rank among all 667 CPUs in our database.

Measured performance

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is 1% faster in the Blender benchmark

AAMD Ryzen 7 1700X136

Median of 2 submissions

BAMD Ryzen 7 2700138

Median of 3 submissions

Blender Benchmark render score (samples per minute, higher is faster), the median of community-submitted results from Blender Open Data. One of these parts has very few submissions, so treat the gap as indicative.

A
B
Lowest: 2Average: 22Highest: 79

Gaming

A20%Basic
B26%Basic

Better pick: Ryzen 7 2700 · Max boost clock: 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz

Office Work

A27%Basic
B35%Fair

Better pick: Ryzen 7 2700 · TDP / base power: 65 W vs 95 W

Daily Use

A28%Basic
B34%Basic

Better pick: Ryzen 7 2700 · TDP / base power: 65 W vs 95 W

Content Creation

A34%Basic
B35%Fair

Too close to call

02 · Verdict

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 comes out ahead

It wins 3 of 8 compared specifications and scores higher overall. Check current prices before you buy.

AAMD Ryzen 7 1700X

27/100

BAMD Ryzen 7 2700

33/100

AAMD Ryzen 7 1700X

Advantages

  • Base clock 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz (6% higher)

Disadvantages

  • TDP / base power 95 W vs 65 W (46% higher)
  • Max boost clock 3.8 GHz vs 4.1 GHz (7% lower)
  • Blender render score 136 samples/min vs 138 samples/min (1% lower)

BAMD Ryzen 7 2700

Advantages

  • TDP / base power 65 W vs 95 W (32% lower)
  • Max boost clock 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz (8% higher)
  • Blender render score 138 samples/min vs 136 samples/min (1% higher)

Disadvantages

  • Base clock 3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz (6% lower)

03 · Full comparison

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationAAMD Ryzen 7 1700XBAMD Ryzen 7 2700
Measured performance
Blender render scoreMedian of community-submitted Blender Benchmark results (Blender Open Data). Higher is faster.136 samples/min138 samples/min Better +1%
Benchmark submissionsHow many results the median is based on. Small numbers are less reliable.23
Cores & clocks
Cores88
Efficiency (E) cores——
Threads1616
Base clock3.4 GHz Better +6%3.2 GHz
Max boost clock3.8 GHz4.1 GHz Better +8%
Memory & cache
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Memory supportDDR4DDR4
Power
TDP / base power95 W65 W Better
Features
Integrated graphicsNoNo
Platform
ArchitectureZenZen+
SocketAM4AM4
Manufacturing process14 nm12 nm
Release year20172018
Launch price$399$299

Ready to buy?

Prices change daily. Check the current price of each part.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.