ToolsPouch

CPU comparison

Intel Core i9-14900KS vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Benchmark comparison and full specifications, with the measured difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

ACheck Price on AmazonIntel Core i9-14900KSBCheck Price on AmazonAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

APart A

Intel

Core i9-14900KS

  • Blender render score 541 samples/min
  • Cores 24
  • Max boost clock 6.2 GHz
VS

BPart B

AMD

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

  • Blender render score 581 samples/min
  • Cores 16
  • Max boost clock 5.7 GHz
Compare other parts

01 · Performance profile

How they score

Scores out of 100 for each way you might use a processor. The chart shows where both parts rank among all 667 CPUs in our database.

Measured performance

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 7% faster in the Blender benchmark

AIntel Core i9-14900KS541

Median of 3 submissions

BAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D581

Median of 49 submissions

Blender Benchmark render score (samples per minute, higher is faster), the median of community-submitted results from Blender Open Data.

A
B
Lowest: 2Average: 22Highest: 79

Gaming

A79%Excellent
B94%Excellent

Better pick: Ryzen 9 7950X3D · L3 cache: 128 MB vs 36 MB

Office Work

A79%Excellent
B79%Excellent

Too close to call

Daily Use

A72%Good
B74%Good

Too close to call

Content Creation

A72%Good
B70%Good

Too close to call

02 · Verdict

Too close to call

Both parts score within a few points. Choose on price, availability and the use case that matters most to you.

AIntel Core i9-14900KS

76/100

BAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

79/100

AIntel Core i9-14900KS

Advantages

  • Cores 24 vs 16 (50% higher)
  • Max boost clock 6.2 GHz vs 5.7 GHz (9% higher)

Disadvantages

  • L3 cache 36 MB vs 128 MB (72% lower)
  • TDP / base power 150 W vs 120 W (25% higher)
  • Base clock 3.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz (24% lower)
  • Blender render score 541 samples/min vs 581 samples/min (7% lower)

BAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Advantages

  • L3 cache 128 MB vs 36 MB (256% higher)
  • Base clock 4.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz (31% higher)
  • TDP / base power 120 W vs 150 W (20% lower)
  • Blender render score 581 samples/min vs 541 samples/min (7% higher)

Disadvantages

  • Cores 16 vs 24 (33% lower)
  • Max boost clock 5.7 GHz vs 6.2 GHz (8% lower)

03 · Full comparison

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationAIntel Core i9-14900KSBAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Measured performance
Blender render scoreMedian of community-submitted Blender Benchmark results (Blender Open Data). Higher is faster.541 samples/min581 samples/min Better +7%
Benchmark submissionsHow many results the median is based on. Small numbers are less reliable.349
Cores & clocks
Cores24 Better +50%16
Efficiency (E) cores16—
Threads3232
Base clock3.2 GHz4.2 GHz Better +31%
Max boost clock6.2 GHz Better +9%5.7 GHz
Memory & cache
L3 cache36 MB128 MB Better +256%
Memory supportDDR4 / DDR5DDR5
Power
TDP / base power150 W120 W Better
Features
Integrated graphicsYesYes
Platform
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshZen 4
SocketLGA1700AM5
Manufacturing processIntel 75 nm
Release year20242023
Launch price$689$699

Ready to buy?

Prices change daily. Check the current price of each part.

ACheck Price on Amazon: Core i9-14900KSBCheck Price on Amazon: Ryzen 9 7950X3D

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

Intel Core i9-14900KS vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at a glance

This page compares the Intel Core i9-14900KS and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D using published specifications and real measured benchmark results. In the Blender Benchmark, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D posts a median render score of 581 against 541 for Intel Core i9-14900KS, making it 7% faster. The medians are based on 49 and 3 community submissions.

Intel Core i9-14900KS: 24 cores, 32 threads, 6.2 GHz max boost clock, 150 W tdp / base power, released in 2024, launched at $689. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D: 16 cores, 32 threads, 5.7 GHz max boost clock, 120 W tdp / base power, released in 2023, launched at $699.

Our overall scores are 76 for Core i9-14900KS and 79 for Ryzen 9 7950X3D out of 100. By use case, the better pick is, for gaming: Ryzen 9 7950X3D; for office work: too close to call; for daily use: too close to call; for content creation: too close to call. Blender measures rendering rather than game frame rates, so treat the gaming result as a guide built from render performance and specifications.

Core i9-14900KS vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D FAQ

Which is faster, the Core i9-14900KS or the Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

In the Blender Benchmark, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D posts a median render score of 581 against 541 for Intel Core i9-14900KS, making it 7% faster. The medians are based on 49 and 3 community submissions.

Which uses more power, the Core i9-14900KS or the Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

The Intel Core i9-14900KS is rated at 150 W and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 120 W, so the Ryzen 9 7950X3D draws 25% less on paper. Rated power is not the same as power drawn in your own workload.

How much did the Core i9-14900KS and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D cost at launch?

The Intel Core i9-14900KS launched at $689 and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at $699. Street prices change often, so check a current price before buying.

Is the Core i9-14900KS or the Ryzen 9 7950X3D better for gaming?

Our gaming score favours the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (79 vs 94 out of 100). That score blends measured render performance with clock speed, cache and memory, because no game benchmark is included in our data.

More CPU comparisons

About this data

Benchmark numbers come from Blender Open Data, a public collection of results submitted by real users, shown as medians with the submission count. Specifications and launch prices are compiled from manufacturer information and may contain mistakes. See how it all works on thePC Parts Comparison page, or report an error through our contact page. This page contains affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.