ToolsPouch

CPU comparison

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Benchmark comparison and full specifications, with the measured difference and a clear winner for gaming, office work, daily use and content creation.

ACheck Price on AmazonIntel Core Ultra 9 285KBCheck Price on AmazonAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

APart A

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

  • Blender render score 575 samples/min
  • Cores 24
  • Max boost clock 5.7 GHz
VS

BPart B

AMD

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

  • Blender render score 581 samples/min
  • Cores 16
  • Max boost clock 5.7 GHz
Compare other parts

01 · Performance profile

How they score

Scores out of 100 for each way you might use a processor. The chart shows where both parts rank among all 667 CPUs in our database.

Measured performance

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1% faster in the Blender benchmark

AIntel Core Ultra 9 285K575

Median of 118 submissions

BAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D581

Median of 49 submissions

Blender Benchmark render score (samples per minute, higher is faster), the median of community-submitted results from Blender Open Data.

A
B
Lowest: 2Average: 22Highest: 79

Gaming

A73%Good
B94%Excellent

Better pick: Ryzen 9 7950X3D · L3 cache: 128 MB vs 36 MB

Office Work

A79%Excellent
B79%Excellent

Too close to call

Daily Use

A73%Good
B74%Good

Too close to call

Content Creation

A68%Good
B70%Good

Too close to call

02 · Verdict

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D comes out ahead

It wins 5 of 8 compared specifications and scores higher overall. Check current prices before you buy.

AIntel Core Ultra 9 285K

73/100

BAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

79/100

AIntel Core Ultra 9 285K

Advantages

  • Cores 24 vs 16 (50% higher)

Disadvantages

  • L3 cache 36 MB vs 128 MB (72% lower)
  • Threads 24 vs 32 (25% lower)
  • Base clock 3.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz (12% lower)
  • TDP / base power 125 W vs 120 W (4% higher)
  • Blender render score 575 samples/min vs 581 samples/min (1% lower)

BAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Advantages

  • L3 cache 128 MB vs 36 MB (256% higher)
  • Threads 32 vs 24 (33% higher)
  • Base clock 4.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz (14% higher)
  • TDP / base power 120 W vs 125 W (4% lower)
  • Blender render score 581 samples/min vs 575 samples/min (1% higher)

Disadvantages

  • Cores 16 vs 24 (33% lower)

03 · Full comparison

Side-by-side specifications

SpecificationAIntel Core Ultra 9 285KBAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Measured performance
Blender render scoreMedian of community-submitted Blender Benchmark results (Blender Open Data). Higher is faster.575 samples/min581 samples/min Better +1%
Benchmark submissionsHow many results the median is based on. Small numbers are less reliable.11849
Cores & clocks
Cores24 Better +50%16
Efficiency (E) cores16—
Threads2432 Better +33%
Base clock3.7 GHz4.2 GHz Better +14%
Max boost clock5.7 GHz5.7 GHz
Memory & cache
L3 cache36 MB128 MB Better +256%
Memory supportDDR5DDR5
Power
TDP / base power125 W120 W Better
Features
Integrated graphicsYesYes
Platform
ArchitectureArrow LakeZen 4
SocketLGA1851AM5
Manufacturing processTSMC N3B5 nm
Release year20242023
Launch price$589$699

Ready to buy?

Prices change daily. Check the current price of each part.

ACheck Price on Amazon: Core Ultra 9 285KBCheck Price on Amazon: Ryzen 9 7950X3D

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices and availability are set by Amazon.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at a glance

This page compares the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D using published specifications and real measured benchmark results. In the Blender Benchmark, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D posts a median render score of 581 against 575 for Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, making it 1% faster. The medians are based on 49 and 118 community submissions.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: 24 cores, 24 threads, 5.7 GHz max boost clock, 125 W tdp / base power, released in 2024, launched at $589. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D: 16 cores, 32 threads, 5.7 GHz max boost clock, 120 W tdp / base power, released in 2023, launched at $699.

Our overall scores are 73 for Core Ultra 9 285K and 79 for Ryzen 9 7950X3D out of 100. By use case, the better pick is, for gaming: Ryzen 9 7950X3D; for office work: too close to call; for daily use: too close to call; for content creation: too close to call. Blender measures rendering rather than game frame rates, so treat the gaming result as a guide built from render performance and specifications.

Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D FAQ

Which is faster, the Core Ultra 9 285K or the Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

In the Blender Benchmark, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D posts a median render score of 581 against 575 for Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, making it 1% faster. The medians are based on 49 and 118 community submissions.

Which uses more power, the Core Ultra 9 285K or the Ryzen 9 7950X3D?

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is rated at 125 W and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 120 W, so the Ryzen 9 7950X3D draws 4% less on paper. Rated power is not the same as power drawn in your own workload.

How much did the Core Ultra 9 285K and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D cost at launch?

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K launched at $589 and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D at $699. Street prices change often, so check a current price before buying.

Is the Core Ultra 9 285K or the Ryzen 9 7950X3D better for gaming?

Our gaming score favours the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D (73 vs 94 out of 100). That score blends measured render performance with clock speed, cache and memory, because no game benchmark is included in our data.

More CPU comparisons

About this data

Benchmark numbers come from Blender Open Data, a public collection of results submitted by real users, shown as medians with the submission count. Specifications and launch prices are compiled from manufacturer information and may contain mistakes. See how it all works on thePC Parts Comparison page, or report an error through our contact page. This page contains affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.